• Life is never perfect.  But i wouldnt want to be anywhere else but here.  Happiness is a choice.  Wake up every morning with a smile. Smile for at least a minute and it will stick on you thoughout the day.  Inshaallah.  Be blessed peeps.  

"Kalau I Kerja Means I Kerja la"

Holla...

Can I say that sometimes the best person u can rely is yourself, and thus it is important to love yourself because only then you wont hurt yourself and wont allow yourself to get hurt. Sometimes you have to trust yourself more before you can trust anyone else.. or at least the trust must be accompany with cautions or else you will be in terrible pain.

I dont feel good today. I dont feel happy today. It's partly my own fault for losing control of myself and emotion. I dont feel like doing anything other than burying myself into a couple of agreement drafting due on monday. So that is what I'm going to do. And to quote someone "kalau I kerja, means I kerja la" - ayat cam tak bg gangu kan? so ok la.. now jom kita plak kerja. 

Nite to those with sleepy eyes.. sweet dreams. ;)

Regards,

Dee

Powerful and Active Role of the Judiciary

The Malaysian Judiciary is among the government bodies comprising of The Legislative Body, The Executive and The Judiciary existing as independent institutions. The main function of the Judiciary is to ensure compliance with the Federal Constitution, and to uphold justice in accordance with the laws of Malaysia. Apart from the role to adjudicate and resolve legal matters arising between individuals as well as individuals and the state, the courts also serve to interpret the laws of Malaysia. The Malaysian Judiciary undertakes and executes these special tasks and obligations to uphold and preserve the Federal Constitution.

By virtue of Article 121(1) of the Federal Constitution, the judicial power of the Federation is vested in the High Court of Malaya and the High Court of Borneo and in such inferior courts provided by federal law. The judiciary is empowered to hear and determine civil and criminal matters, and to pronounce on the legality of any legislative or executives cuts. The law also confers on it the authority to interpret the Federal and State Constitution.

The Judicial Authority of the country is vested in the Federal court, the High court and subordinate courts. The Federal court is the highest court in Malaysia.

To enable it to perform its judicial function impartially, the judiciary must be independent. This means the independence of the individual judges in the exercise of their judicial function and the independence of the judiciary as an institution.

Though in Malaysia it’s almost summer all year long with one or two rainy season comes around when least expected, but in the field of law, it is perpetual spring where both old and new jurisdiction continually send forth new growth from the precedent principles, sometimes to fill in the small interstices in a lattice of established law, sometimes sprouting urgently and luxuriantly to cover an area bare of legal principle.

The manner and the extend of the growth of new law is largely in the hands of the Judges and mainly the judges of the superior courts as the power conferred on them carries more weight and their function as they define new principles and find new application for principles already established. Though the question posted here are literally on the contribution of the “Superior Court”, nevertheless I am going to denote my discussion on the contribution of the judges as being part of the Superior court as they are the entity responsibly involves directly or indirectly, depending on the different jurist view; in the manner in which the law are made suitable for the changes in the society

It is in no question that the powers to make law theoretically are conferred primarily on the Parliament. Nevertheless there has also been an agreed opinion for as long as the legal spheres are concern that the judges filed in the gaps left by rules using their discretion. Positivistic jurisprudence from Austin to Hart placed strong emphasis on the part played by judges in the exercise of their discretion.  In the modern world, the discretionary power raise the question on “exactly what part do judges play in the development of law”; “Do judges MAKE or DECLARE law?”.

The courts must not shy away from discharging their constitutional obligation to protect and enforce human rights of the citizens and while acting within the bounds of law must always rise to the occasion as guardians of the constitution. The judges have to be alive to the reality that as society changes, the norms acceptable to the society also changes, and that while discharging the constitutional duties, they have to develop the law on those lines.

Most members of the judiciary hastily deny any implication that they reform the law. According to Lord Simonds, "heterodoxy, or as some might say, heresy is not the more attractive because it is dignified by the name of reform" and law reform "is the task not of the courts of law but of Parliament".

The famous common law theorist and a legal positivist, Hart, believes that there are clear indication that Judges do indeed create new law where, existing laws have become outdated or inappropriate. It is well known that the judges’ role is not only to read the law but to interpret it. In doing so, judges have to be independently creative and not only in interpreting written law but also the development of the law in the society as a whole. Their freedom of being creative is however is restricted by the rules of precedent and the supremacy of Parliament and by the rules of precedent and statutory interpretation.

Occasionally, judges are called upon to give a ruling or make a decision when faced with a situation for which there seems to be no precedent or any guiding rules. In these circumstances, judges can be said to be formulating original precedent. Thus, it is the judge’s role to use his own discretion regarding when he thinks rules need to be applied, changed, improved or abolished. Hart sees the function of law as being one of a system of rules; he maintains a firm belief that where there are gaps in the system judges should use their own discretion when applying the law. He believes that because statutes and common law rules are often too vague and unclear it is often expected for a judge to create new law. He talks about the open texture of law means that are, indeed, arrears of conduct where courts or officials striking a balance, in the light of circumstances, between competing interests, which vary in weight from case to case, must leave much to be developed.

Dworkin in an opposing view sees judges as decision maker who discover and declare the existing law through the rules of precedent and not according to his own private judgment. They are not delegated to pronounced new law but to maintain and expound the old one as according to the known laws and customs of the land.

The question on whether judges make law or not is not as far this paper is concern as either way the judges whether in making new law or by mere decision making does contribute to the fast changing development of law in way or another.

According to Raz, courts do develop the law; they do that by working out the implications of internal legal considerations. Courts in developing the law do not give expression to their personal views, nor do they reflect external social or political forces. Rather, they unravel the spirit of the law, unfold its hidden force and reveal its meaning. He says that judges can make the law even when precedent binds them by distinguishing it with the previous decision but this is very restricted form of law making subjected to two crucial conditions. Firstly, the modified rule must be the rule laid down in the precedent restricted by the addition of further condition for its application and secondly, the modified rule must be such as to justify the order made in the precedent. The judges’ obligation is to adopt only that modification which will best improve the rule. In the exercise of their law making power the courts should within the legally imposed restrictions act by adopting the best rules they can find. They may make a new rule in a decision, which he thinks is a purely law applying decision.

As far as interpreting the statutes are concern, the interpretation of every statutory provision must keep pace with changing concept’s and values and it must, to the extent to which its language permits or rather does not prohibit, suffer adjustments through judicial interpretation so as to accord with the requirements of the fast changing society which undergoing rapid social and economic transformation.

Besides interpreting the law, judges may also exercise they limited discretion power by laying new norms of law and to contour the law to suit the changing social and economic scenario to make the ideals enshrined in the Constitution meaningful and a reality.

Law does not operate in a vacuum. It is therefore intended to serve a social purpose and it cannot be interpreted without taking into account the social, economic and political setting in which it is intended to operate. It is here that the judge is called upon to perform a creative function. He has to inject flesh and blood in the dry skeleton provided by the legislature and by a process of dynamic interpretation, invest, it with a meaning which will harmonize the law with the prevailing concepts and values and make it an effective instruments for delivery of justice.

Thus the contribution from the courts can be made not only by constitutional interpretation, but also interpreting statutes seamlessly with the changing times and it is here that the creative role of the judge appears and accordingly contributes to the process of legal development.

As discuss earlier, though the court in being creative are tied down at some point to the precedent rules, they do not need to follow the precedent blindly and do not always consider them bound by the given principles. The court does evolve new principles. When new societal conditions and factual situations demand the judges to speak, they, without professing the tradition of judicial lock-jaw, must speak out.

In an Indian case, M.C. Mehta v Union of India, the court said that with the development and fast changing society the law cannot remains static and that the law has to develop its own new principles. The above decision reflects that the courts do make law, they frame new principles; interpret the statutes and the constitution with the changing times.

Furthermore, the court should not hesitate in giving effect to the constitutional policy such as equality, socio-economic justice, liberal interpretation and recognition of rights of the individuals giving effect to a more meaningful life. 

Judicial decisions are seen as legal principles which are binding upon judges. Old principles will have to be applied to new and unforeseen situations; and in this process they may take a shape they had never shown before. Legal principles may be actualised by a statute, but also by a court of law. We should add that legal principles discipline the judge: the judge complies with the system of the law. Judges may not interpret the law according to their own convictions unless they find it consistent with the structural design of the legal system as a whole, and also with the dominant past lines of interpretation by other judges.

However, we should not forget the passive or reactive nature of the judiciary. They decide cases one at a time, but in a large quantity. This means courts often attribute to the development of the law in an uneven, unsystematic, often illogical way. That does not alter the fact that especially the Supreme Court should use its possibilities to contribute to the development of the law by developing as much as possible clear and specific rules and the summing up of circumstances that are relevant for the decision.

The coordination of judicial decision-making is also relevant. Judges can make agreements on how to interpret the law in the future or a special way of access to the Supreme Court could be created to ensure special attention to the co-ordination of judicial decision-making. Promoting legal certainty and equality in this way, the legitimacy of the courts will grow.

In public law, legal principles especially will come to the fore, when the judiciary becomes more actively involved in the legal protecti­on of the citizen. The judiciary, on the basis of case law, may developed legal princi­ples with regard to improper actions and decisions of the administ­ration. The courts, in cooperation with jurisprudence, may developed legal princi­ples of justice which offer protection to the citizen.

Nevertheless, the judiciary should certainly be very cautious in reviewing enacted law, a fortiori in reviewing Acts of Parliament. Judges are disciplined by the specificity of the cases they must decide and, as a result, their professional experience reflects the value of deliberative wisdom , the wisdom that consists in a knowledge of particulars and that no general theory can provide. Because of their specialized legal education, judges are experts at applying the law, and more broadly at making value judgements. The authority of judges derives in part from their epistemological competence.

Lastly, in employing the binding judicial precedent, the court are normally bound to judicial precedent by the same court in it’s hieracy or above them. However, consideration shall also be denoted to following international precedent.

In common law countries, precedents are theoretically binding if a higher court has rendered a decision on the question, or if there is a previous decision of the same court. However, recently many common law courts have recognized that precedent should not be strictly adhered to if it will cause injustice. If a judge did not want to follow a particular precedent, he could always distinguish it on technical ground from his present decision.

In conclusion following the above discussions, an important point to be emphasis is that while engaging themselves in exercising their powerful role, the court must be able to be more willingly open to criticism. The independent judiciary is formally not accountable to anyone, but they are certainly public. They are constantly in the public gaze, and subject to public criticism. They are judged by the public and respond to it. The decisions of the courts contribute to the law in one way or another by the interpretation, the clarification, and, sometimes, the development of the law which shall be done creatively and independently without strictly and constantly required to adhere to judicial precedents. Especially, in the development of law, courts should be alive and active in framing the law in line with the growth of the law.

Note: My references made using several sources online and this article is intended for sharing of knowledge and information only. Please let me know if any of the content herein is offensive to any party/ies. Enjoy. 

Pre-World Cup Prediction - Oren Sprite vs Diana Dee

Salam all,

Just to make this coming World Cup a lot more Interesting, here is a rough prediction on which team shall go through to the next round..... feel free to comment your own predictions.... ;)

http://www.fifa.com/worldcup/groups/index.html

lovess... Dee

My Late Grandfather.

My Tata. 

He was very nice to me.

He will take me to fetch my sisters from school.

I remembered he will take to play tire-swing tied from the branch of a tree

He will sit with me at the porch of his house waiting for the time to pick my sisters from school or while waiting my mom / dad to pick us up after work 

He is a man with very less words

but very big heart

He is the only grandfather that I knew and have the time to love.

He raised my dad to be who he is now - A MAN

and only a MAN can raised a child to be MAN

and I pray that my SON will become a MAN,

just like his grandfather and great grandfather.

I pray for his soul to be in peace.

Amin.

Lots of LOVE;

Dee

Fan of a fan's group?

Holla lovely peeps!!

I am not a big fan of Malaysian football. Never have been. So I would be not the person you want to be with in the stadium watching football unless it is Malaysian team against other International club - then, this will be a different story, perhaps. 

My previous entry I did wrote about the Ultras, and I have a question now - Does all this people who goes to the stadium to watch the match really are a die-hard fan or even simply a fan at all of the game?? or are they fan of the Ultras??  The reason for my question is that, the Ultras seems to be more exciting then the match itself. ;) ... there are more spirit from the bench then on the field itself. 

peace ;)

Dee.. 

 

23.05.2014 - SAMPAI MATI !!!

Cerita hari ini,
Aku lukis dalam hati,
Cinta hati ini,
Aku simpan hari mati.

Diri aku ini,
Benarkan cinta kenal mati.
Walau satu hari,
Aku janji pada diri,
Harus buka mata hati,
Kenali satu cinta sampai MATI.

Who is the Hooligans? - as opposed to the ULTRAS by DON a.k.a OREN SPRITE

Kenali PUNK & SKINHEAD terlebih dahulu sebelum kenal HOOLIGANS , ini kerana mereka adalah punca kewujudan HOOLIGANS tersebut  dan jangan samakan Ultras dengan HOOLIGANS , kerana Ultras terdiri daripada semua peringkat umur dan jantina .. dalam Ultras ada HOOLIGANS , akan tetapi Ultras bukanlah HOOLIGANS .. HOOLIGANS lebih gemar berada berdekatan dengan penyokong pasukan lawan dan menjadikan diri mereka sebagai benteng mahupun barisan hadapan ketika pertempuran dengan pasukan lawan .. berbanding Ultras yang berada di Curva mereka sendiri .. sifat patriotik dalam diri , bangga dengan gaya permakaian mereka dan keberanian untuk bertindak kepada pihak lawan menjadi mentaliti dan ideologi paling utama dalam kotak minda HOOLIGANS !

Not Born To Be ...

I am not born to be a Punk or A Skin Head lover.. Sorry my heart just can't go there... no hatred.. just lack of interest. ;) ..

but take note, loving a person personally is different than loving what he represent.

Muahhh.. ;)
xoxo - DEE

Not Feminism, Just Common Sense.

My thoughts today is drawn on one particular issue that has been around for centuries and now in the modern era, the mindset has still not change when everything else has undergo revolutions. I am writing this as a Woman who has always been conscious about the role of a Woman in the society, in business, in politics, role of a wife in a household, role of a Mother towards her children and what is being expected from them and whether what is expected from them is at all fair and reasonable?

My writing today is particularly in regards to what is expected from a wife and what are the roles that men have set their mind to expect from a woman after marriage. In Norms, and please don’t get me wrong here, by norms I means out of 10, there might be 1 or more to odd this out – but in norms, a woman is expected out of her to cook, to clean, to wash, to attend to her husband’s need and wants – sexual or non-sexual needs, to attend to her children’s needs and wants, and in general make sure everything in the house is in order and well taken care of. I mean.. really? I know a lot of man out there will be cursing me right now and will be on their defensive mode.. but come on.. at some point you guys know this is true.

I am not ruling all the above expected roles out as I think it is okay up to a certain level to expect woman to participate in an active role in a household but my issue is, when Men is said to be the HEAD OF FAMILY, the BREADWINNER, the IMAM in the family, the PROTECTOR, he is carrying a very High and Heavy responsibility but this responsibility now is seems to revolve more on the matter of bringing home cash, providing wealth, putting food on the table… it is all monetary in value..  and in today’s world, this is shared together with his wife. Nowadays, the wife is contributing up to half (in some cases more) to the family financial fund. When this is in fact in reality, why are the traditional roles is still being expected from the wife??

Is it fair to expect the wife to wake up early in the morning before her husband and children wakes up,  to prepare breakfast, prepare them to work and school… when she has not been getting much sleep due to late night dish washing, ironing the children’s uniform and her husband’s work cloth and pleasing her husband in bed… AND when she has to go to work herself?

If this is the case, and in many cases it has been the issue, should the husband start to stop and re-think their position as the head of family?? Should carrying such title means more responsibility should be expected out of them, more than their wife? Should they be the one who ensure that everything is being taken care of and his wife and children’s well-being is his top priority? This is what they know should be the right perspective but is it being practice? Is it in reality being implemented? From my view, my answer would be NO.

If the wife can share her income? Why can’t the husband share the household chores and be in control of all the family affairs instead of branching it out to the wife and spend the free time watching football until late night with friends at mamak or playing futsal on working night and be home just in time for a  “semen removal” session and a good sleep afterwards.

Be A MAN by character.. Not just man by gender. Know your Resposibility. Know what is expected from you before expecting it from others... 

Peace ;)

Lots of LOVE.. DEE

   

My Unrealistic dream - Not Impossible ??

Salam and What's up Peeps??

As some of you guys who knows me.. I've put on some weight some 2 years back and now released that i need to loose them after looking at my old pictures when I was in s size. So now, I'm actually on a strict diet and actually exercising religiously. 

I also have this dream to have a killer abs the one like in the picture below and not the one with six pack as i think six pack is sexier on man.. ;).

Not sure if I can get this shape within 6 months but fortunately for me, I have someone who is kind enough to be my coach and has my back and will always boost up my spirit when I am not feeling it anymore.. (You Know Who You Are).

So, we shall see the result in 6 months, if I ever accomplished my goal. hehe ;)

Love ;)

My Consciousness on ULTRAS.

Holla Peeps...

I bet a lot of you guys out there knows about the existence of the 'ULTRAS', but I'm a total alien to this until few days back when I was doing my stalking activity on Mr. Don a.k.a Oren Sprite. This entry is however not about him.. because that would take forever for me to write. This entry is about my FIRST perspective on the ULTRAS in Malaysia.

Who are they? What They Do? Their Chants? Their passions towards football and their unconditional dedication towards the team they support.The idea of the whole fan-club-like, supporting the team that they truly believe in, in this case is somehow patriotic. Why? They are mostly supporting the team representing a state they are from, or their country.

Patriotism is good but when it comes to healthy competition, patriotism may ruin it on some level when some people just over do it. From what I was served by the Youtube and by Mr. Google, supporting becomes not just chanting encouraging positive words anymore, which helps in the spirit boosters but it takes chanting and supporting in a whole different level and gives healthy competition a whole different meaning and patriotism a whole different perspective - it is a spirit booster alright! It boost aggressiveness along side with provocation for hatred.

I might be a dreamer or idealistic in this matter, but my first thought was, what happen to healthy peaceful cheering? where we can have a decent disagreement on the stadium bench against the team at other side of the stadium and still have the consciousness to make peace after the match instead of taking it outside the stadium to prolong what can be ended when the game end and any sorrow should have just be left behind in the stadium. I've also came to learned that, some of this provocation of hatred started long even before the match's day.

Nevertheless, After doing some thinking, I came to realized now, that at some point, this patriotism is needed in our country especially in the heart and soul of the young generation. This are the people who will stand tall defending the nation's pride as they possess courage and a built-in fighting spirit for what they love and cherish.

Thus, I came to conclude that, every white must have black spots and every black shall also come with  white spots... just keep the violence in necessity mode and the vulgar words away from kids ears. You stand tall on what you believe in ULTRAS... and May all the good things rest on your path. ;)

Jodoh

Assalammualaikum,

I terbace this posting on one of my good friend's blog, Cik Beddi. Basically the entry was about jodoh and I guess she's a lil frustrated when peep keep asking her about not planning to get married yet. I agreed when she said "jodoh tuh di tangan Allah S.W.T". 

The reason why I agreed with her is that, I believe that it is not necessary to bercinta lama - lama tuk kawin cause at the end of day, bercinta lelama tuh bukan suatu kepastian untuk bertemu jodoh ngan org yg dicintai lelama itu. Kalau dah jodoh, kenal hari nih, minggu depan pun dah leh nikah. I berani ckp nih cause I ader ramai kawan yg mcm nih. Ader yg bercinta 5-6 tahun tapi last last nikah ngan org lain yg baru kenal 2 bulan. ader plak yg kenal 5-6 tahun tapi mmg langsung tak de plan nak kawin. tapi last last depa kawin jugak. ader plak yg konon nya tekad tak nak kawin sampai umo 30, tapi last last dia yg kawin dulu. and ader plak yg kata tak nak la kawin kalau tak jumpa lelaki cam Aaron Aziz (hehe), tapi last last, jodoh ngan ... yg tak langsung mcm Aaron Aziz.

And in the last past one month or so, I've learned that few of my close friends will be getting married soon after my Majlis. sebelum nih tak de plak dgr anything pasal plan nak langsung majlis.. tetiba jer... sebab tuh... Jodoh tak leh diduga, kadang lagi kita tak mencari, lagi dekat sebenarnya jodoh itu dengan kita... Jadinya, jgn kita tutup pintu hati untuk terima jodoh, dan jgn pula kita beria-ia mengejar jodoh yg mungkin cuma ilusi... Berdoa dan redha la atas segala rancangan Nya... Sesungguhnya Jodoh itu adalah dengan Izin dan KetentuanNya. 

So, Beddi... to those yg berckp pelik pelik tuh.. IGNORANCE IS THE BEST MEDICINE...  love ya!! ;)

TOP 20 New Playlist - 2011

This is My 2011 TOP NEW Playlist. Can't Wait for more Fab. Rockin Music in 2012... BTW, the below is listed in no particular order. ;)

1. Boyce Avenue – Grenade (Cover)

http://youtu.be/Aqfsto6mJ_4

2. Taylor Swift – Teardrops on My Guitar

http://youtu.be/xKCek6_dB0M

3. Jason Mraz – Geek In Pink

http://youtu.be/SdryssUmlpE

4. Lady Antebellum – Just A Kiss

http://youtu.be/v_yTphvyiPU

5. Daughtry – Crawling Back To You

http://youtu.be/g2WJ3mhjgHA

6. Coldplay – Every Tears is a Waterfall

http://youtu.be/fyMhvkC3A84

7. The Fray – Heartbeat

http://youtu.be/hp0_2fjPlbM

8. Boyce Avenue – When The Lights Die

http://youtu.be/LP346UnjC_w

9. One Direction – What Makes You Beautiful

http://youtu.be/QJO3ROT-A4E

10. Bad Meets Evil ft Bruno Mars – Lighters

http://youtu.be/YWt4wmZ_EMI

11. Adelle – Someone like you

http://youtu.be/hLQl3WQQoQ0

12. 3 Suara (Ning, Jac & Shila) – Beribu Sesalan

http://youtu.be/MSddbmtZZw8

13. Hafiz & Adira – Ombak Rindu

http://youtu.be/a-mqkjDnljo

14. Pasha Ungu ft Adelia – Penghujung Cintaku

http://youtu.be/2HGCalLLJkE

15. Agnes Monica – Matahariku

http://youtu.be/SLMGrux86L8

16. Maher Zain – For The Rest of My Life

http://youtu.be/PHbZ9SXHJwA

17. Mizz Nina ft Flo Rida – Takeover

http://youtu.be/0j-RWuAnB_A

18. Faizal Tahir – Karma

http://youtu.be/NCcFnuZvBsg

19. Meet Uncle Hussein ft Hazama – Pokok

http://youtu.be/NYpik1TUQYo

20. Altimet, DJ Fuzz, Ila Damiaa, Point Blanc, Rabbit Mac - Malaysian Boy

             http://youtu.be/vjdN72quIM4

~~Till Next Time~~

Happy New Year.. 2012 !!!

Wishing All Of You A Happy New Year and May All Be Blessed With A Better Year... ;)

2011 has been an exhausting yet great year. Some of the things that happen really did challenge my inner capacity to cope physically and emotionally. Nevertheless, I never felt stronger and the experience is priceless. The trust laid upon me by those who believe in me has pushed me to the boundaries that even I don’t know I’m capable of. All in all, it was an amazing year with no regret.. every steps taken was worth every second of my time..

And now being able to breathe the fresh air of the year 2012 is not without a hope that a better year will begin. It is with all gratefulness to Allah S.W.T to be blessed with another wishfully exciting and wonderful year. Amin, Ya Rabbal Alamin.

~~Check out My next Post for my the TOP 20 songs in my 2011 playlist~~

Till Next Time!! Peace!!

Favor, Karma & Friendship ..

Assalammualaikum,

Today, Naim & I went for our compulsory HIV Test.. and the outcome is as predicted à NON-Reactive. In other words, we are clean from HIV. Alhamdulillah. ;)

But, that is not why I’m writing today. Let’s talk about “FAVOR” today. Those who have known me for sometimes knew that, I’m the kind of person who finds it difficult to say “NO” to anyone, especially when I know them. So, normally when people ask my favour, I’ll do anything in my power to grant them the favour. And when I do grant them the favour as requested, I don’t normally ask anything back in return. BUT, it is nice to know they appreciate it and not just take it for granted. 

No matter what people say, I do believe in KARMA. If we do something good, eventually good things will happen to us and vice versa.  So, I try my best to not hate people and also to forgive one’s wrong-doing, even when it is hard to forget. Usually, when I’m not that found of someone and it is getting close to hating that person, I would keep my distance and try to avoid any kind interaction with that person. This is to prevent myself from hating that person.  And so far, in my life, there’s no one person who I hate but there’s by far, 2 person  that I can’t stand  in my life. The reason why I can’t stand them is self-justifiable.

Back to “favour” again. This time let’s talk in terms of “FRIENDSHIP”.  I just couldn’t understand those people who are in a position to be called friend but cannot even say “hi” to my face whenever we cross path, but have the “courage” to ask for assistance whenever they feel like it. And the best part is, they couldn’t even ask it face-to-face. I mean, how “heroic” one must be to ask favour from someone, when they can’t even say one word to; face-to-face. And even when I assisted them, as soon as they get what they want, I won’t hear from them again until the next time they need a favour.

So, here’s a thought. I would LOVE to assist anyone (if I can), as long as the next time you see me, perhaps walking down the stairs or getting in or out of my car, or sitting in my office, or when we’re in the same room,  try talking to me or a simple “hi Dee” will do. Try being a friend, cause I’m willing to give you the” benefit of a doubt”.   I think that is reasonable. Yes? Cause, honestly, I can’t make peace with myself for refusing (in purpose) to help a person when I knew I can help them. Unless, you are a perfect stranger; I have never know you in my life and there’s no one else you could ask and you are not a con-man/woman… then it would be a different case all together.

~~Till Next Time~~ ;)

When it was all lies.. It can never be REAL..!

We ain't got no past..
and Hell, we ain't got no future
history you say?
hate to break it to you, but..
all we had was a bunch of lies laid on a bed of egoes..
you. me. and all who had pretended to care.
history can't be created based on lies..
so, do us all a favor and wake up.
open your eyes.
see who's next to you.
cause that is CURRENT.
that is REAL.
and believe me when I say,
it ain't gonna get any better than that.

~~Something that I wrote in my journal few months back, just to remind myself to live in the current, and always keep it real and that lies will always be lies, thus no matter how hard we try, or how much it hurts, It will never be true.~~

Crime and Punishment

"A former student who is morbidly self-obsessed, murders an old woman money-lender with a borrowed hatcher in a desperate attempt to free himself from poverty.".- Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoyevsky. It's my current reading material. Hope to finish reading it by end of this coming week. First 2 chapters seems interesting. lets just hope that it's gonna be interesting and exciting till the end.

Dee goes Hip Hop Tonight...!!!

     

Hye Ya'll,

"Yes, Dee is more of a rock kind of girl, but she used to have some Hip Hop sort of music on her top playlist." Here are few that I can remember listening to and some memories to go with it.... Enjoy people..!!

As the name itself suggest, this kinda my fav song during my "clubbing" days, which is over now by the way. (Can't stand loud music and heavy crowd anymore nowadays). I remembered everytime the DJs played this song, the crowd will go wild and we'll screamed our lungs out.. It is fun when you are in your early 20s.. but now just by walking pass the club I could feel my lung pounding hard and ready to explode. Nevertheless, it is  refreshing to hear this song again every now and then at the comfort of my own space and time.. ;)

Shaggy has always been about fun. His songs mostly has lyrics that is kindda entertaining and funny. His Music Video also is fun to watch. Craig David was not bad himself. Few of his song has been on top 50 of my MP3s list. These songs was also famous in the clubs during my clubbing days...

Eminem, was and still is the most talented "white man" on earth when it comes to rap/hip hop. At least I do think so. He is amazing at what he does and this, below, was one of his earlier songs that I love. It has this depressing meaning into it but none the less, it gives you a picture that life is never gonna be perfect... cool..!

OK... I think most of those in my age (more or less) can't deny being a fan of this groups in the 90s. The first ever concert that I'd been to, was theirs. they are pretty cool back then, and pretty talented too. They are not afraid to come up with something different (in Malaysia). I remembered playing their song on my keyboard. Below was one of my fav song and embarrassingly I confessed having a crush on Norman.... keep in mind ya'll, IT WAS IN MY EARLY HIGH SCHOOL DAYS then... :p  

This was one of my fav too. I mean, it was the "talk" during my MMU days. This was actually an actual break-up song. The upper one, was the ex-bf who caught his girl cheating on him. Below was the girl version who'd responded to the song made my her ex-bf  who'd caught her cheating. listen to the lyrics and you guys can know the story... I think... Well, It's amazing when you can broadcast you break-up through a song and it became a hit... At least they make some cash out of their break-up... owh..!! but It kindda 18sx... so, LISTEN AT YOU OWN RISK... ;) enjoy!!